The Nice Guy, The Bitch, an The Orifice

What you just saw was an ad for the Orifice. It is a new sex toy targeting the anxieties of lonely young men. In a world where masculinity is being redefined to exclude the positives, because that would exclude women from having those traits and the negatives highlighted in the media, a large societal assumption that we have unwittingly developed is that the measure of a man's worth to society is his sexual access to women.

This assumption runs deep and has been beaten into psychological research by feminist activists. The only prosocial masculine trait is that of the Playboy. This might seem like a childish, yet innocuous obsession but it is deranging society in more ways than one. We are in the middle of a sex recession and moral panic about the evils of the male sex drive, yet we put the expectation on young men to prove they are having sex with women to show that they are good people and not monstrous incels waiting to attack. What happens when the majority of young men fail to pass the test of personhood? What happens when an entire industry is built around exploiting their loneliness? What happens when women reject 95% of men on dating apps, while preaching body positivity for themselves. What happens when these men are told sex is not a human right, while women make abortion, the right to have consequence free sex their most important political issue? What happens when single motherhood is the most expensive non military expenditure making the sexless men unwilling participants in their own cuckoldry? What happens when traditional families don't form and single men and single women vote for different parties? What happens when we follow the battle of the sexes to it's logical conclusions?

Those are the questions that interest us at Powered By Orgasm. We examine economics, culture, and politics in an age of sexlessness.

In this age of sexlessness, the spectre of the incel looms over us, but he is largely a meme. The internet memed these men into existence, but before the Elliott Rodger manifesto shocked the world the term feminists had for problematic sexless young men was "nice guy". The nice guy was a man who thought being nice was enough to woo woman, and lamented that "bad boys" seemed to do better than him romantically. Feminists shriek that he thinks he has any say over how women have sex, while criticizing men for watching pornography and engaging in hook up culture. Feminist tend to interpret everything a man does in the worse possible light, but let's look at some of the cultural problems that young men are facing. 

Masculinity has been under attack in the media for the majority of young men's lives. Men have been removed from the childrearing process in the home and in the schools. Before boys build any psychological defenses they are bombarded with messages about toxic masculinity. Many of these men are raised by single mothers who are unable to guide them through the unique challenges that they face, and the feminized school system denies they exist. 

Let's look at the evolution of masculinity as feminists activists have applied political pressure on the field of psychology. The term toxic masculinity implies that distinctly masculine traits are inherently toxic. If a trait is distinctly masculine and positive, that would sexist. Feminism is fundamentally a hate movement and like all hate movements they do the very things they accuse their detractors of doing. Feminist theory says that women need men like a fish needs a bicycle, and masculinity is toxic and men are  dangerous nuisances that need to be controlled and have their power taken. Men aren't very useful and should be tolerated at best, but their is a certain type of men that shouldn't be tolerated under any circumstances. That man is known as the incel. He is a sex object, and like a broken vibrator he is told he is worthless not only that he is told he is a bad person.

How is an incel or a nice guy formed?

Let's ask Megan Fox

This is Megan Fox, an actress who is lusted over by men saying she is explicitly raising her son to be the antithesis of the me she has shown a revealed preference for entering into romantic relationships with. He is being raised to "respect" women and disdain toxic masculinity. He is probably over socialized and will have avoidant behavior beat into him by a school system that encourages this behavior.

He will go through puberty conflicted about his masculine identity and he will become interested in sex as all teens do. He will rely on his training that encourages him to psychologically castrate himself in his interactions with women. Women are heterosexual and while his mother may tell him things about how she wants him to behave and engage in borderline abusive son husbanding behavior, she will leave out the most important part.

The women he pursues are not his mother. If he relates to them on that level, they may develop a platonic relationship, but they will never be viscerally attracted to him. He may find himself in the friend zone, and think he has a shot at sealing the deal if he does all the things she complains about the men she dates not doing. He fails to realize the traits that make them not do that, are the traits that make them attractive. He also fails to realize that the traits that he has that makes him want to do those things, make him unattractive.

He feels led on, lied to and used by the women he fails to court. He doesn't realize that he can leave the friend zone whenever he wants and go find a woman who appreciates him. He feels the need to let a woman who won't have sex with him monopolize time and resources. He has an entitlement program, he's not entitled enough. He fails to realize that his mother "hates" the men she dated and had sex with because they knew their worth, set boundaries, and were prepared to leave and they did leaving her a single mom. The son husbanding didn't let him know his mom ain't shit and neither are most women.

Women lie, cheat, and are opportunistic. Everyone does these things, but society has the running theme women are angels. His hatred for women is the size of his former love. His personality has been beaten and formed for birth. It's too late for him to change into a normal person with well defined boundaries. He becomes are a broken man who writes on incel forums or he becomes antisocial and hostile to overcompensate. In other words he takes the black pill or he takes the red pill.

Why does the Orifice matter? 

It gives the nice guy leverage. Women have noticed that most men are unable to engage in hook up culture, and OnlyFans is a surrogate fo intimacy. Women are using political power to create scenarios that force men to seek out the things they want in the most degrading way imaginable. Most men have to pay to talk to a women and have them be nice. 

Men pay for a simulacrum of intimacy and are derided for their weakness.

The Orifice allows them to punish women by giving them an alternative. It is a more genuine relationship, as the Orifice feels nothing instead of contempt.

Women have forced men at gunpoint via taxes to pay them to have sex with the most attractive men, and use the loneliness and desperation of average men as a vehicle to enrich themselves. It is no surprise that a lot of men are politically uniting to crush women's power. While feminist shriek at this the backlash was inevitable. Men want to replace women with surrogates and only go after the women they find most attractive just as women have done. They want to lower their economic output to put strain on the entitlement programs only women use. We are beginning to see men actually join the gender war.

Women have mostly done this to themselves. Let's look at one of the leading women in the world, Sheryl Sandberg.

Alpha Fucks Beta Bucks

Sheryl Sandberg basically says that women should engage in what the RedPill calls Alpha fucks and Beta Bucks. Everyone seems to agree with the Red Pill, they just seem to have a problem with men using this information to their advantage. They don't want high value men to know their value and use their leverage accordingly.

Alpha males probably should just juggle women indefinitely and understand that women will endure almost any abuse to have sex with him. Beta Bucks men should probably just fuck hookers in their 20s and start dating younger women, and tell the Sheryl Sandberg types who are in their 30s to fuck off. 

The redpill is fundamentally about describing the aggregate behavior of women and planning your dealings with them accordingly. If modern women are going to be prostitutes literally and spiritually a man should decide if he is a pimp or a customer. A man should understand that patriarchy has been disdained by women, so old order thinking goes out the way.

The fundamental mistake of the nice guy is investing too much into his relationship. Patriarchy is ultimately rule of the father. It refers to a man who invests the maximum amount in the women he sleeps with. Women have used their political power to invert this dynamic. The measure of a man is how little he invests in the female sexual morality dominated world. Paying for sex is emasculating under patriarchal norms, not because he paid, but because he paid to little. Patriarchy was about ensuring only virtuous stable men reproduced, so in a non patriarchal society a smart man is not virtuous.

A nice guy would benefit from reading about hobbyists. These are men who use sex workers regularly and have a systematic way of getting the cheapest and best deals. It would teach him how cheap a woman really is when she starts listing the a list of things she wants in a man. $150 is standard for a blowjob with an average looking women. You probably shouldn't go above $600 if you want full service from a dime piece.

The nice guy should deal with his stages of grief and mourn an idealized love that never existed. Romance is dead, if it ever existed. Marriage was a form of reproductive communism, and communism only works if everyone does it. One of the core tenants of the feminist movements was destroying the family unit and allowing less stifling sexual behavior for women. Women want to share the most attractive men and monetize the least attractive ones, preferably without having to fuck them.

The nice guy needs to understand that his exploitation by women is his own fault. He can easily get sex if he pays, but considers himself a gentlemen. It is his gentleness that is holding him back. He has the power to enjoy the sexual variety of an Alpha male by seeing hookers, but his idea of a good guy won't let him. He needs to understand that the only thing that matters is leverage and his leverage is money. Once he understands that he will feel powerful and know his worth. He'll be more selective about the women he pursues and tolerate less bad behavior. He needs to understand women's "love" is an illusion. A prostitute is an honest women. She loathes her loyal customers and respects the men who treat her like the cutthroat mercenary she is. Never be a prostitute's regular. Only use your indifference to haggle.

The nice guy needs to understand that he is the only one who will ever care about him and women will never love him in the way he expects to be loved. His mother lied to him about herself. She loved the men who knocked her up and made her a single mother and she has plenty of suitors who are decent men who would do the right thing. She knows that their doing the right thing comes from a place of not knowing how little women appreciate it. She takes them for fools and may use them for a while, but will discard them at a moments notice and she still pines over the men who left her.